Ethical Theories, Leadership, and The Ethical Lens Inventory

INTRODUCTION
Leadership is often defined as the ability to influence people. An effective ethical leader guides an organization and its employees to accomplish organizational goals. In the same vein, an unethical leader can guide an organization and its employees to act unethically, harming both the organization and the stakeholders. Being a leader is an exploration, a reflection, and a test of your leadership values. Seeking understanding of how you resolve ethical dilemmas, taking inventory of where an ethical weakness may lie, and examining the traits of an ethical leader helps you define, shape, and apply an ethical decision-making framework, while also taking into consideration all stakeholders who may be impacted by your decisions.
For this task, you will respond to an ethical situation as well as analyze the results of the Ethical Lens Inventory (ELI), including your top five values from the Clarifying Your Values exercise, both of which should be completed in the course of study. This task focuses on you as a leader by helping you to define, refine, and test your ethical boundaries through self-reflection and analysis.
SCENARIO
You are a sales representative for a medical device company that manufactures artificial joints. Your company has developed an artificial knee joint that is less expensive than the competition and will dramatically reduce healing time for patients. However, it is also known to produce a serious and potentially lethal infection in a small percentage of patients. The company refuses to disclose this potential side effect. You feel you have a duty to divulge this issue, but you signed a nondisclosure agreement when you were hired and worry about possible repercussions.
REQUIREMENTS
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The originality report that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
Write an essay (suggested length of 6–8 pages) in which you do the following:

1.  Select a nonfictional leader who you feel has exhibited exemplary ethical conduct and do the following:
2.  Discuss twoethical traits your chosen leader has demonstrated.
3.  Explain how your chosen leader has exhibited ethical conduct.

Note: The chosen leader can be someone you know personally or someone famous.

1.  Compare the deontological and consequentialist perspectives and how each perspective would approach the dilemma from the scenario.
2.  Explain which level of cognitive moral development (i.e., preconventional, conventional, or postconventional) is represented in the scenario for eachof the following questions:

•  Which action would most likely serve the greater good in society?
•  If I reveal this information, will I get into trouble and possibly even lose my job?
•  Which action best aligns with my long-held belief in the principle of justice?
•  What do the laws say, and what would a law-abiding citizen do?
•  If I keep quiet will I get some sort of reward?

1.  Reflect on your Ethical Lens Inventory (ELI) by doing the following:
2.  Explain your preferred ethical lens, or what it means to have a center perspective relevant to the ELI.
3.  Analyze whether you have the same preferred lens in different settings (e.g., work, personal, social).
4.  Explain bothyour primary values and classical virtue(s) from the ELI.
5.  Compare twoprimary values and oneclassical virtue from part D2 individually with three of the top five values from the Clarifying Your Values exercise.
6.  Describe oneof the following from the ELI: your blind spot, risk, double standard, or vice.
7.  Discuss threesteps you can take to mitigate the blind spot, risk, double standard, or vice described in part D3 in order to make better ethical decisions in the future.
8.  Discuss how you plan to use the ethical lens(es) to approach ethical situations throughout your professional life.

1.  Submit a copy of the PDF file with your results from the ELI, as a separate document.
2.  Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
3.  Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

File Restrictions
File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
File size limit: 200 MB
File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z
RUBRIC
A1:ETHICAL TRAITS

A2:ETHICAL CONDUCT

B:DILEMMA ANALYSIS

C:LEVELS OF COGNITIVE MORAL DEVELOPMENT

D1:PREFERRED ETHICAL LENS

D1A:DIFFERENT SETTINGS

D2:PRIMARY VALUES AND CLASSICAL VIRTUE(S)

D2A:COMPARISON TO TOP FIVE VALUES

D3:BLIND SPOT, RISK, DOUBLE STANDARD OR VICE

D3A:MAKING BETTER ETHICAL DECISIONS

D4:USE OF ETHICAL LENSES

E:ELI RESULTS

F:SOURCES

G:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION