Case Study Gooding

When a vacancy arose on the school board for Gooding Public Schools, Scott Rogers decided to throw his hat into the ring for consideration. A former college professor who had retired to the small Midwest town, Scott was hoping to help the historically “good old boy” board focus more on educational pursuits than its traditional emphasis on high school athletics.
Shortly after Scott was appointed to the board, a local family with Native American ancestry came before the board to ask that the name of the Gooding High School’s athletic teams be changed from the Redskins. The family found the use of Redskins as a team name to be offensive. “The use of the word Redskin is essentially a racial slur,” said Scott, “and as a racial slur, it needed to be changed.”
The request set off a firestorm in the small town of 7,000. The school’s athletic teams had competed as Redskins for 50 years, and many felt the name was an integral part of the community. People personally identified with the Redskins, and the team and the team’s name were ingrained in the small town’s culture.
totally out of control,” Scott says. “Locals would say, ‘I was born a Redskin, and I’ll die a Redskin.’ They argued that the name was never intended to be offensive and that it honored the area’s relatively strong Native American presence. The local family that raised the issue was getting all sorts of national support, and speakers came in from as far away as Oklahoma to discuss the negative ramifications of Native American mascots. Local groups argued back that these speakers weren’t from Gooding and shouldn’t even be allowed to be at the board meetings.”
Scott felt strongly that the name needed to be changed. In meeting after meeting, he tried to explain to both his fellow board members and those in the audience that if the name is offensive to someone and recognized as a racial slur, then the intent of its original choosing was irrelevant. If someone was offended by the name, then it was wrong to maintain it.
Finally, Scott put forward a motion to change the name. That motion included a process for the students at Gooding High School to choose a new name for their athletic teams. The board approved the motion 5–2. The students immediately embraced the opportunity to choose a new name, developing designs and logos for their proposed choices. In the end, the student body voted to become the Redhawks.
There was still an angry community contingent, however, that was festering over the change. They began circulating petitions to recall the school board members who voted for the change, and received enough signatures for the recall to be put up for an election.
“While the kids are going about the business of changing the name and the emblem, the community holds an election and proceeds to recall five of the seven members of the board,” Scott says. The five recalled members include Scott and the other board members who voted in favor of the name change.
The remaining two board members, both of whom were ardent members of the athletic booster organization, held a special meeting of the board (all two of them) and voted to change the name back to the Redskins.
That’s when the state’s Department of Civil Rights and the Commission for High School Athletics stepped in. They told the Gooding School Board there could not be a reversal of the name change and that Gooding High School’s teams would have to go for four years without one, competing only as Gooding.
Over the course of those four years, new school board members were elected, and the issue quieted down. At the end of that period, the students again voted to become the Gooding Redhawks.
“You know, the kids were fine with it,” says Scott. “It’s been ten years, and there’s an entire generation of kids that don’t have a clue that it was ever different. They are Redhawks and have always been Redhawks.
“It was the adults who had the problem. There’s still a small contingent today that can’t get over it. A local hardware store still sells Gooding Redskins T-shirts and other gear. There is just this group of folks that believe there was nothing disrespectful in the Redskins name. Once that group is gone, it will be a nonissue.”
Questions

  1. What change were the people in Gooding trying to avoid? Why do you think they wanted to avoid this change? What tactics did they use to resist change?
  2. Would you describe the efforts of Scott Rogers or the school board as adaptive leadership? Why or why not?
  3. How would you describe the holding environment created by the school board? Do you think it was successful? Why or why not?
  4. Citing examples, describe how the school board engaged or didn’t engage in each of these adaptive leader behaviors: get on the balcony, maintain disciplined attention, and give the work back to the people.
  5. What group would you describe as the “low-status group”? How did the school board seek to give voice to this group?

Case Study Gooding

When a vacancy arose on the school board for Gooding Public Schools, Scott Rogers decided to throw his hat into the ring for consideration. A former college professor who had retired to the small Midwest town, Scott was hoping to help the historically “good old boy” board focus more on educational pursuits than its traditional emphasis on high school athletics.
Shortly after Scott was appointed to the board, a local family with Native American ancestry came before the board to ask that the name of the Gooding High School’s athletic teams be changed from the Redskins. The family found the use of Redskins as a team name to be offensive. “The use of the word Redskin is essentially a racial slur,” said Scott, “and as a racial slur, it needed to be changed.”
The request set off a firestorm in the small town of 7,000. The school’s athletic teams had competed as Redskins for 50 years, and many felt the name was an integral part of the community. People personally identified with the Redskins, and the team and the team’s name were ingrained in the small town’s culture.
totally out of control,” Scott says. “Locals would say, ‘I was born a Redskin, and I’ll die a Redskin.’ They argued that the name was never intended to be offensive and that it honored the area’s relatively strong Native American presence. The local family that raised the issue was getting all sorts of national support, and speakers came in from as far away as Oklahoma to discuss the negative ramifications of Native American mascots. Local groups argued back that these speakers weren’t from Gooding and shouldn’t even be allowed to be at the board meetings.”
Scott felt strongly that the name needed to be changed. In meeting after meeting, he tried to explain to both his fellow board members and those in the audience that if the name is offensive to someone and recognized as a racial slur, then the intent of its original choosing was irrelevant. If someone was offended by the name, then it was wrong to maintain it.
Finally, Scott put forward a motion to change the name. That motion included a process for the students at Gooding High School to choose a new name for their athletic teams. The board approved the motion 5–2. The students immediately embraced the opportunity to choose a new name, developing designs and logos for their proposed choices. In the end, the student body voted to become the Redhawks.
There was still an angry community contingent, however, that was festering over the change. They began circulating petitions to recall the school board members who voted for the change, and received enough signatures for the recall to be put up for an election.
“While the kids are going about the business of changing the name and the emblem, the community holds an election and proceeds to recall five of the seven members of the board,” Scott says. The five recalled members include Scott and the other board members who voted in favor of the name change.
The remaining two board members, both of whom were ardent members of the athletic booster organization, held a special meeting of the board (all two of them) and voted to change the name back to the Redskins.
That’s when the state’s Department of Civil Rights and the Commission for High School Athletics stepped in. They told the Gooding School Board there could not be a reversal of the name change and that Gooding High School’s teams would have to go for four years without one, competing only as Gooding.
Over the course of those four years, new school board members were elected, and the issue quieted down. At the end of that period, the students again voted to become the Gooding Redhawks.
“You know, the kids were fine with it,” says Scott. “It’s been ten years, and there’s an entire generation of kids that don’t have a clue that it was ever different. They are Redhawks and have always been Redhawks.
“It was the adults who had the problem. There’s still a small contingent today that can’t get over it. A local hardware store still sells Gooding Redskins T-shirts and other gear. There is just this group of folks that believe there was nothing disrespectful in the Redskins name. Once that group is gone, it will be a nonissue.”
Questions

  1. What change were the people in Gooding trying to avoid? Why do you think they wanted to avoid this change? What tactics did they use to resist change?
  2. Would you describe the efforts of Scott Rogers or the school board as adaptive leadership? Why or why not?
  3. How would you describe the holding environment created by the school board? Do you think it was successful? Why or why not?
  4. Citing examples, describe how the school board engaged or didn’t engage in each of these adaptive leader behaviors: get on the balcony, maintain disciplined attention, and give the work back to the people.
  5. What group would you describe as the “low-status group”? How did the school board seek to give voice to this group?

Case study Assignment (Dianrong case study)

Read the Dianrong case study (see attachment) and answer the following questions with substantive answers in a cohesive essay. Your paper should be at least 3 pages in length. Use proper grammar, spelling, citations, etc.
1. What are the trade offs that Dianrong is facing? How should the company prioritize its objectives? What should Soul Htite do?
2. As detailed in Exhibit 1 of the case, there are different collaboration models that Dianrong has adopted in working with various parties on technological development. How should the company decide on the nature of collaboration for technological developments in the future (via organic and in-house developments, partnerships, joint ventures, or acquisitions)?
3. Assuming that the company manages to raise an additional US$100 million, how should Dianrong allocate the capital across its many business units to maximize value in the long run? Should the company spend the money on internal R&D initiatives or M&A pursuits? Or both?
4. How should the company work with the local regulations in China? Should the company focus on reviving the P2 industry in China in the process? If so, how?
5. Are there other technologies that Dianrong should consider adding to its already expansive portfolio of technologies? In contrast, are there technologies that may seem redundant at the firm at the moment? How should Dianrong manage this to improve its competitive edge with its “technology DNA?”
Compose essay in APA format, including the introduction and conclusion, and in-text citations for all sources used. In addition to 3 page (minimum) essay, must include an APA-style title page and reference page.

Case study Assignment (Dianrong case study)

Read the Dianrong case study (see attachment) and answer the following questions with substantive answers in a cohesive essay. Your paper should be at least 3 pages in length. Use proper grammar, spelling, citations, etc.
1. What are the trade offs that Dianrong is facing? How should the company prioritize its objectives? What should Soul Htite do?
2. As detailed in Exhibit 1 of the case, there are different collaboration models that Dianrong has adopted in working with various parties on technological development. How should the company decide on the nature of collaboration for technological developments in the future (via organic and in-house developments, partnerships, joint ventures, or acquisitions)?
3. Assuming that the company manages to raise an additional US$100 million, how should Dianrong allocate the capital across its many business units to maximize value in the long run? Should the company spend the money on internal R&D initiatives or M&A pursuits? Or both?
4. How should the company work with the local regulations in China? Should the company focus on reviving the P2 industry in China in the process? If so, how?
5. Are there other technologies that Dianrong should consider adding to its already expansive portfolio of technologies? In contrast, are there technologies that may seem redundant at the firm at the moment? How should Dianrong manage this to improve its competitive edge with its “technology DNA?”
Compose essay in APA format, including the introduction and conclusion, and in-text citations for all sources used. In addition to 3 page (minimum) essay, must include an APA-style title page and reference page.

Case study Assignment (Dianrong case study)

Read the Dianrong case study (see attachment) and answer the following questions with substantive answers in a cohesive essay. Your paper should be at least 3 pages in length. Use proper grammar, spelling, citations, etc.
1. What are the trade offs that Dianrong is facing? How should the company prioritize its objectives? What should Soul Htite do?
2. As detailed in Exhibit 1 of the case, there are different collaboration models that Dianrong has adopted in working with various parties on technological development. How should the company decide on the nature of collaboration for technological developments in the future (via organic and in-house developments, partnerships, joint ventures, or acquisitions)?
3. Assuming that the company manages to raise an additional US$100 million, how should Dianrong allocate the capital across its many business units to maximize value in the long run? Should the company spend the money on internal R&D initiatives or M&A pursuits? Or both?
4. How should the company work with the local regulations in China? Should the company focus on reviving the P2 industry in China in the process? If so, how?
5. Are there other technologies that Dianrong should consider adding to its already expansive portfolio of technologies? In contrast, are there technologies that may seem redundant at the firm at the moment? How should Dianrong manage this to improve its competitive edge with its “technology DNA?”
Compose essay in APA format, including the introduction and conclusion, and in-text citations for all sources used. In addition to 3 page (minimum) essay, must include an APA-style title page and reference page.

Review Case Study

Instructions

Review Case Study 6.1 in your textbook on pp. 169–170, and address the questions that are provided below. In essay format, provide a complete and detailed response to each question. You are required to use at least your textbook as source material for your essay. Each of the responses should be compiled into a document that consists of at least two pages. Your essay should address the following questions:

  1. What factors encouraged the entrepreneurs to develop an alternative to the traditional source of primary care?
  2. What characteristics did the urgent care center concept have that might make it unattractive to mainstream healthcare consumers?
  3. What assumptions did the developers make at the outset about the demand for such service and the type of consumers who might use it based on how consumers make decisions regarding health care?
  4. From the market research, did the developers find that the urgent care center model would appeal to the general population or that some segments of the population would find it more attractive than others?
  5. What was the profile of the best prospects for utilization of an urgent care center?
  6. Explain the products, product mix, and various ways the developers conceptualize products for the target consumer. How would the product mix at urgent care centers differ from those in primary care facilities?
  7. Explain how marketing of the urgent care center’s attributes should be highlighted to influence the target audience’s decision to visit the center.

Application Case

Questions for Discussion
1. Why is the recommender system useful? (Relate it to one-to-one targeted marketing)
2. Explain how recommendations are generated?
3. Amazon disclosed its recommendation algorithms to the public but Netflix did not. Why?
4. Research the research activities that attempt to “mimic the human brain”.
5. Explain the changes due to the globalization of the company.
INSTRUCTIONS.
1. No Plagiarism at any cost as the assignment is attached to safe-assign.
2. The submission date is Saturday (11/4/20).
3. The solution document should be 2 page and entirely in APA formatting.
4. Atleast 3 references in APA format
5. Should answer the questions in different paragraphs based on the attached application case.
Some useful references:
1. Sharda, R; Delen, D; Turban, E (2020). Analytics, Data Science, & Artificial Intelligence: Systems for Decision Support (11th Edition) 11th Edition. Pearson
ISBN-13: 978-0135192016
ISBN-10: 0135192013

Application Case

Questions for Discussion
1. Why is the recommender system useful? (Relate it to one-to-one targeted marketing)
2. Explain how recommendations are generated?
3. Amazon disclosed its recommendation algorithms to the public but Netflix did not. Why?
4. Research the research activities that attempt to “mimic the human brain”.
5. Explain the changes due to the globalization of the company.
INSTRUCTIONS.
1. No Plagiarism at any cost as the assignment is attached to safe-assign.
2. The submission date is Saturday (11/4/20).
3. The solution document should be 2 page and entirely in APA formatting.
4. Atleast 3 references in APA format
5. Should answer the questions in different paragraphs based on the attached application case.
Some useful references:
1. Sharda, R; Delen, D; Turban, E (2020). Analytics, Data Science, & Artificial Intelligence: Systems for Decision Support (11th Edition) 11th Edition. Pearson
ISBN-13: 978-0135192016
ISBN-10: 0135192013

Game Theory Scenario: the Prisoners' Dilemma

Instructions

  • Watch the media presentation describing a Game Theory Scenario: the Prisoners’ Dilemma.
  • Read the Case Studies found under Assignment Files below.
  • Pick one of the case studies to analyze. Set-up the analysis by using a similar matrix to what has been shown in the presentation (and script).
  • Discuss the possible decisions that could be made and the outcomes that could occur with each decision.
  • This application assignment should be uploaded as a Word document of at least 350 words. Correct APA style should be used. At least one citation should be added.

Assignment Files

Unit 6 Game Theory Scenario Audio [MP4]
Unit 6 Game Theory Scenario Transcript [Word Document]
New Drug Therapies for Weight Loss Case Study Preview the document[Printable PDF]
Nursing Home Bed Vacancies Case Study Preview the document[Printable PDF]
The Cost of Nursing Home Beds Case Study Preview the document[Printable PDF]
The Development of Competing MRI Services Case Study Preview the document[Printable PDF]

Forms for social work case study

Discuss forms for social work  case study.