Psychiatric Nursing Crisis Case Study – Vignette

Psychiatric Nursing Crisis Case Study – Vignette 

Case Study

Elle, 39, has come in for treatment for severe panic attacks. Her daughter, Savannah, is leaving for college for the first time and is planning on driving up with a friend who will attend the same college. Savannah does not want her mother to go along. Elle says, “I have nightmares about them crashing somewhere and nobody knowing where they are.” She says she and Savannah have had arguments about this. Elle reports that the panic attacks began “about two weeks ago when Savannah and her dad both agreed that it was okay for her to drive up to the college with Jason.” Elle says that her worries are “not about sex. Jason is her best friend, but they’ve never dated, and in fact, Jason has a girlfriend. I admit the college is not far away, so it won’t be an overnight trip, but I don’t want Savannah to drive up with Jason. A three-hour drive. I want to do it.”
During assessment, you learn that 2 years ago, Savannah and her twin, Sophia, were in an after-prom car accident, in which teens in a car were driving to the next town over to go to the beach. Savannah’s twin was killed. Savannah was in the hospital for months and needed physical therapy for 18 months. As she describes the accident, Elle points out that the driver, Sophia’s date, escaped serious injury. “Funny, isn’t it?” she says. “The drunk driver always escapes injury while he hurts everyone around him.”
Savannah has pointed out that “Jason doesn’t drink. You know this. You’ve known him all his life. You’ve always liked him, even when I get annoyed with him.” Elle admits this, but still says, “I don’t want that boy driving her up there. It’s a long way.” Savannah complains that every time the subject comes up, Elle has a panic attack. Elle tells you privately, and sincerely, “I don’t mean to have these panic attacks. And I don’t want them. This just isn’t me.”

  1. Elle admits Jason doesn’t drink; he isn’t sexually involved with Savannah, and she has known him all his life, and that she’s always liked him. Yet she refers to him now as “that boy.” (1) Her fears aside, what emotional response to this new crisis for Elle is she displaying, particularly toward Jason? Do you think this emotion is directed just at Jason or at someone else as well? (2) What does this tell you about her current perception of this crisis?
  2. Now that you have a clearer vision of Elle’s perception of the crisis, what further aspects of Elle’s current status should you assess?
  3. While finishing your assessment, you learn that Elle has two very close friends, and a pretty solid marriage. Her husband has avoided the arguments between Savannah and Elle, declaring that “Savannah is a grown-up now, and capable of making such a small choice as who will drive her to school, on her own.” He refuses to get involved, and while he is sympathetic and affectionate during and after Elle’s panic attacks, he says they scare him a little. He wonders if there isn’t medication to control these.
    You also learn that her best friend is her sister, who lives in town. This sister moved in with Elle right after Sophia’s death and was a “great comfort” during the early stages of grief and also came to the hospital almost every day to sit with Elle and Savannah during those first rough months. Elle’s sister has proposed that they have a “girl time” with Savannah the night before she leaves for college, but Elle has said, “I can’t think about that right now.”
    You have not quite decided which level of crisis intervention to use just yet, but how could you apply strategies from the first three levels of crisis intervention—environmental manipulation, general support, and generic approach—in tackling Elle’s current situation?

How could you apply strategies from the fourth level of crisis intervention—i.e., the individual approach—in tackling Elle’s current situation?

Nursing Theories of Practice

Nursing Theories of Practice
Theories of Practice
What is a theory?
Theory can be defined as “one or more relatively concrete and specific concepts that are derived from a conceptual model, the propositions that narrowly describe those concepts, and the propositions that state relatively concrete and specific relations between two or more concepts” (Butts & Rich, 2018, p. 101).
Theory is a hypothesis tested and measured to explain, predict, describe, and prescribe relationships between concepts and is developed through quantitative research.
The difference between a model and a theory is the amount of proof that exists in demonstrating the outcomes they predict. Both models and theories show relationships between concepts.
Directions
In this assignment, you will locate a grand and middle-range nursing theory and examine the utility of your chosen theories for guiding research and practice.
You will locate one grand nursing theory and one middle-range nursing theory applied in a research study. You will examine how each theory was applied within the research study and then analyze the utility of grand and middle-range nursing theories to advance the discipline of nursing and its impact upon your advanced nursing practice.
Assignment Details
For this Assignment, your paper must be 2 to 4 pages, not including the title and reference pages.
To view the Grading Rubric for this Assignment, please visit the Grading Rubrics section of the Course Resources.
Assignment Requirements
Before finalizing your work, you should:

  • Minimum requirement of at least five sources of support
  • be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above);
  • consult the Grading Rubric (under the Course Resources) to make sure you have included everything necessary; and
  • utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors.

Your writing Assignment should:

  • follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.);
  • be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful;
  • display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and
  • use APA 6th Edition

Legal Dilemmas

Legal Dilemmas
Instruction
Answer the 2nd Critical Thinking question at the end of Chapter 6: Write a 1000-1250 word essay addressing each of the questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. There should be at least six sections, one for each question. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least four (4) citations in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.
Critical thinking question =
One day, Linda arrives at work on the behavioral care unit. She is informed that the staffing office has requested that a nurse from the psychiatric unit report to the intensive care unit (ICU). They need help in caring for an agitated car accident victim with a history of schizophrenia.     Linda goes to the ICU and joins a nurse named Corey in providing care for the patient. Eventually, the patient is stabilized and goes to sleep, and Corey leaves the unit for a break. Because Linda is unfamiliar with the telemetry equipment, she fails to recognize that the patient is having an arrhythmia, and the patient experiences a cardiopulmonary arrest. Although he is successfully resuscitated, he suffers permanent brain damage.
Right to practice section must answer:
a. Can Linda legally practice in this situation? (That is, does her RN license permit her to practice in the intensive care unit?)
Ability to practice section must answer:
b. Does the ability to practice legally in an area differ from the ability to practice competently in that area?
Assignment Refusal section must answer:
c. Did Linda have any legal or ethical grounds to refuse the assignment to the intensive care unit?
Unprepared for Practice section must answer:
d. What are the risks in accepting an assignment in an area of specialty in which you are professionally unprepared to practice?
Retaliation Risks section must answer:
e. Would there have been any way for Linda to minimize the risk of retaliation by the employer had she refused the assignment?
Hospital Negligence section must answer:
f. If Linda is negligent, is the hospital liable for any harm to the patient caused by her?

Legal Dilemmas

Legal Dilemmas
Instruction
Answer the 2nd Critical Thinking question at the end of Chapter 6: Write a 1000-1250 word essay addressing each of the questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. There should be at least six sections, one for each question. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least four (4) citations in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.
Critical thinking question =
One day, Linda arrives at work on the behavioral care unit. She is informed that the staffing office has requested that a nurse from the psychiatric unit report to the intensive care unit (ICU). They need help in caring for an agitated car accident victim with a history of schizophrenia.     Linda goes to the ICU and joins a nurse named Corey in providing care for the patient. Eventually, the patient is stabilized and goes to sleep, and Corey leaves the unit for a break. Because Linda is unfamiliar with the telemetry equipment, she fails to recognize that the patient is having an arrhythmia, and the patient experiences a cardiopulmonary arrest. Although he is successfully resuscitated, he suffers permanent brain damage.
Right to practice section must answer:
a. Can Linda legally practice in this situation? (That is, does her RN license permit her to practice in the intensive care unit?)
Ability to practice section must answer:
b. Does the ability to practice legally in an area differ from the ability to practice competently in that area?
Assignment Refusal section must answer:
c. Did Linda have any legal or ethical grounds to refuse the assignment to the intensive care unit?
Unprepared for Practice section must answer:
d. What are the risks in accepting an assignment in an area of specialty in which you are professionally unprepared to practice?
Retaliation Risks section must answer:
e. Would there have been any way for Linda to minimize the risk of retaliation by the employer had she refused the assignment?
Hospital Negligence section must answer:
f. If Linda is negligent, is the hospital liable for any harm to the patient caused by her?

Historical Contributions to Public Health Nursing

Historical Contributions to Public Health Nursing, Instructions
Address the following.
In APA format explain what you believe to be the 5 greatest historical contributions to public
health nursing/community-oriented practice today.

Letter of Recommendation for Acceptance into Nursing

Letter of Recommendation for Acceptance into Nursing 
Use the attached details plus CV.  Write 550-650 words.

Nurses Role in Public Health Crisis. Role of Nurses in Public Health Crisis. PICO Paper Assignment

PICO Paper Assignment
Instructions for writing the PICO paper assignment
The PICO paper assignment will be your first nursing research experience. Students are instructed to find THREE nursing research article, no more than five (5) years old, that will support your topic.  The paper is intended to help you identify evidence based practice guidelines and utilize current nursing research. Select your nursing topic related to concepts studied this semester. The purpose of this critical thinking paper is to enable the student to develop an understanding of how to read a nursing research article, analyze what it says, and then incorporate the information into a two to three page paper (not including title page and reference page).
Papers will follow American Psychological Association (2010) (APA) 6th ED format. All papers will be submitted through Turnitin.com. The original articles MUST be submitted with the paper. This is NOT an opinion paper. Papers will be written in third person.
Students are advised to start the paper early and go to the Student Support Office for assistance by the tutors. Papers should be 5-6 pages, excluding the title page and reference page.  This paper is intended to help you understand how to interpret existing research, with the plan to implement the knowledge into your nursing practice.   Articles must be from nursing research journal, and contain abstract, methods, sample, findings/results, and conclusion. Please refer to the rubric for point calculation.
 
 
 
 
 
The following logic analysis worksheet may be used to help you with your paper (Elder & Paul, 2012).
Analyzing the logic of an article

  1. The main purpose of this article? (State as accurately as possible the author’s purpose for writing this article.)

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 

  1. The key question that the author is addressing is (figure out what the key question on the author’s mind when writing this article):

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 

  1. The most important information in this article is (figure out the facts, experience, data the author is using to support the conclusion):

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 

  1. The main inference or conclusion in this article is (identify the key conclusions the author comes to or presents in this article):

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 

  1. The key concept(s) we need to understand in this article is (are):
    1. By these concepts the author means (figure out the most important ideas you would have to understand in order to understand the authors’ line of reasoning):

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
 

  1. The main assumption underlying the author’s thinking is (what is the author taking for granted that may be questioned):

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 

  1. If we take this line of reasoning seriously, the implications are (what consequences are likely to follow if people take the authors’ line of reasoning seriously):

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Or

  1. If we fail to take this line of reasoning seriously, the implications are (what consequences are likely to follow if people ignore the author’s reasoning):

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 

  1. The main point of view presented in this article is (what is the author looking at, and how is the author seeing it?

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Nurse Leadership and Accreditation

Leadership and Accreditation
________________________________________
Points Possible – 100
Value of Voluntary Accreditation.
Discuss the value of voluntary accreditation in promoting a professional environment that includes accountability of the organization and care providers – ie. communication skills, peer review, advocacy for patients and families, report in of errors, etc.
20 Points.
Role of Nurse Executive.
Articulate the role of the Nurse Executive in leading and managing processes related to voluntary accreditation. Include expectations from an organizational perspective, and expectations from the perspective of the accrediting body.
20 Points
Leader Interview.
50 Points
• Interview: Interview a nurse leader you have not previously interviewed in course 5339 or 5340 who above your current level who has responsibility for ensuring an organization is ready for an accrediting visit. Discuss the nurse leader’s position within the organization. Identify voluntary accreditations in which the organization participates. (10 points)
• Accreditation Responsibility: Discuss the job responsibilities of the nurse leader related to accreditation. (10 points).
• Learning from Success: Provide an exemplar of a leadership action initiated by the nurse leader that influenced a positive outcome in accreditation. (10 points)
• Learning from Failure: Provide an exemplar of a leadership action identified by the nurse leader that could have been done differently to improve outcomes of an accreditation visit. (10 points)
• Cost:Benefit Analysis: From the nurse leader’s point of view, is the cost of preparation worth the benefits of accreditation. (10 points)
APA Format and Organization.
Title Page. Use titles and sub-titles as indicated. Reference List (4-6 references) . Content 500 – 1000 words.
10 Points
Rubric
5340 3.4 Voluntary Accreditation & Leadership
5340 3.4 Voluntary Accreditation & Leadership
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVoluntary Accreditation 20.0 to >13.0 pts
Proficient
The value of voluntary accreditation is clearly identified and discussed with rationale. 13.0 to >7.0 pts
Competent
The value of voluntary accreditation is identified with rationale but incomplete. 7.0 to >0 pts
Novice
The value of voluntary accreditation is not clearly identified, rationale deficient.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRole of the Nurse Executive 20.0 to >13.0 pts
Proficient
Clearly articulate the role of the interviewed nurse leader in leading and managing processes related to voluntary accreditation as well as expectations of the organization and the accrediting body. 13.0 to >7.0 pts
Competent
The role of the interviewed nurse leader in leading and managing processes related to voluntary accreditation as well as expectations of the organization and the accrediting body is present but could be more clearly articulated. 7.0 to >0 pts
Novice
The role of the interviewed nurse leader in leading and managing processes related to voluntary accreditation as well as expectations of the organization and the accrediting body is missing or deficient.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterview 10.0 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Clearly identified is the nurse leader interviewed, position within the organization, and voluntary accreditation’s which the organization participates. 6.0 to >4.0 pts
Competent
Nurse leader is identified, position, and voluntary accreditation’s could be better articulated. 4.0 to >0 pts
Novice
Nurse leader is identified, position and voluntary accreditation’s are unclear.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccreditation Responsibility 10.0 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Responsibilities of the nurse leader in the accreditation process is clearly articulated. 6.0 to >4.0 pts
Competent
Responsibilities of the nurse leader in the accreditation process is present but could be more clearly articulated. 4.0 to >0 pts
Novice
Responsibilities of the nurse leader in the accreditation process is unclear.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLearning from Success 10.0 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
An exemplar is clearly articulated a leadership action initiated by the nurse leader that influenced a positive outcome in accreditation. 6.0 to >4.0 pts
Competent
An exemplar is provided but not clearly articulated a leadership action initiated by the nurse leader that influenced a positive outcome in accreditation. 4.0 to >0 pts
Novice
An exemplar is not provided or is inadequately presented.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLearning from Failure 10.0 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
An exemplar is clearly articulated of an erroneous action related to voluntary accreditation. articulated 6.0 to >4.0 pts
Competent
An exemplar is presented but not clearly articulated of an erroneous action related to voluntary accreditation. articulated 4.0 to >0 pts
Novice
An exemplar is not presented or is inadequate.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCost:Benefit Analysis 10.0 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Cost:Benefit of voluntary accreditation from the Leader’s perspective is clearly articulated. 6.0 to >4.0 pts
Competent
Cost:Benefit of voluntary accreditation from the Leader’s perspective is present but could be more clearly articulated. 4.0 to >0 pts
Novice
Cost:Benefit of voluntary accreditation from the Leader’s perspective is not present or inadequate.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization/APA 10.0 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Met required elements of organization/APA re: Title Page, Formatting,Spelling, Punctuation, Syntax, Grammar and Word Count, and References. 6.0 to >4.0 pts
Competent
Some errors in organization/APA re: Title Page, Formatting, Spelling, Punctuation, Syntax, Grammar and Word Count, and References. 4.0 to >0 pts
Novice
Multiple error. Missing or inadequate crucial elements in organization/APA re: Title Page, Formatting, Spelling, Punctuation, Syntax, Grammar and Word Count, and References.
10.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0
PreviousNext

Windshield Survey (WSS). Community Health Nurse (CHN)

Oftentimes, a Community Health Nurse (CHN) will complete a Windshield Survey (WSS) as a precursor to a formal community assessment.
The CHN uses a WSS in the course of a regular working day, particularly if the CHN has been assigned to new individual and family clients in a previously unfamiliar area. According to your text, Windshield Surveys are the “motorized equivalent of simple observation,” and involve the gathering of data that helps define the community, the trends, stability and changes that may signify the overall health of the community (Stanhope and Lancaster, 2020).
The WSS gives the CHN a glance of what the community looks like and how the community lives. Ideally, Stanhope and Lancaster recommend the WSS to be done at various times of the day so that the entire “life” of the community may be observed. As you will learn from the lecture, a community is a type of living being, in that it has traits, history, strengths, weaknesses, and vulnerable people existing in it. The CHN can apply the nursing process to the community (client) as well as the populations who live in that community. The WSS will evolve as the semester goes along. This is not a project that should be done early and fast! Take time with it! Learn your community!
________________________________________
Guidelines & Instructions
• Utilize the Community Assessment Framework document to guide what constitutes valuable information to gather. Use Table 17.5 on page 383 of the textbook as your primary guide to follow, to include key assessment content, especially regarding place.
• Look for characteristics that you feel define the client/community and the life surrounding it. Pay particular attention to the immediate
surroundings of your clinical site. Valuable information about the needs of the community can be assessed just by looking at the individuals in it!
• Talk with your clinical placement preceptor to gain valuable insight into problems faced by the community and its population, specifically about the population the agency serves. An important component of the assessment is the impact of the community’s strengths and weaknesses upon individuals and families!
• With the information gathered, type a 6-8 page document (APA format) that describes or tells a picture of your community. Include such data as where your clinical site is located in the community, a description, in general terms, of its population and the types of services the population receives.
• Define some health indicators, strengths and weaknesses of the community. This information is part of your nursing assessment
• Develop a working conclusion about the state of health in this community. Define particular problems you are seeing.
• Discuss ways a CHN might address those problems using Core Functions & Levels of Prevention
• Identify who the partners could be in addressing those problems, such as nearby health centers, hospitals, or faith-based institutions.
• Include professional references that strengthen your conclusions or reporting (APA style).
Remember that the Windshield Survey primarily assesses the community in which your clinical site is located, or the community that is served by your clinical site. The Windshield Survey does not focus on your clinical site itself. Although you will include content on your clinical site, its mission, and how the agency serves the community population, the Windshield Survey is designed to analyze the community that your community clinical/agency serves.
DUE DATE IS: 4 weeks from when you receive email notification of your clinical site. Your Clinical Supervisor will confirm with you the due date

Non Hodgkins Lympoma and Hodgkins Lymphoma

Non-Hodgkins Lympoma and Hodgkins Lymphoma
Objectives:
– Discuss the global capstone topic in terms of a pathophysiologic condition or health state/event
that arises as a result.
– Examine the condition utilizing the concepts of the natural history of disease.
– Compare and contrast principles of epidemiology for the condition in the United States versus
globally.
Guidelines:
– Each student will use the topic initiated in the Fall 2019 semester in the Foundations of Nursing
course.
– From that topic, students will identify a pathophysiologic condition or health state/event that is a
direct outcome of the topic.
– Students will write a research-based paper on: 1) how this condition connects to the global
topic, 2) the history of the condition and 3) epidemiological characteristics of distribution,
determinants and specific populations.
– This paper requires the utilization of at least 4 quality research articles from reliable sources.
APA formatting is critical in terms of proper in-text citation and a reference page. Paper should
be between 5 and 7 pages (not counting reference page).
– This project will continue next year to a community perspective in NURS 425 with an
experiential component and from a global perspective in NURS 445.
Section 1: Introduction to the Health State/Event (20%)
– Introduce the disease/health state/event in terms of the global topic selected in semester one.
– Clearly state the selected disease and where it is found globally: Explain why this was chosen,
How does it connect to the global issue
– Use scholarly articles to support your ideas
Section 2: Natural History of Disease (30%)
– Discuss the course of disease from susceptibility to recovery/disability/death
– Susceptibility: who is at risk, precipitating events
Subclinical stage: what is happening at the cellular level, pathogenicity
– Clinical stage: manifestations of disease, sequela
– Recovery, disability or death: discuss prognosis and the most common end point
– use the CDC guidelines for this
Section 3: Epidemiological Characteristics (40%)
– Discuss the epidemiologic data about the disease/health state/event. Present findings on
distribution, determinants and specialized populations.
– Compare and contrast the U.S. data to that of either another country or worldwide. Include the
following:
– Distribution: include incidence, prevalence, morbidity and mortality rates. What is the level of
disease (endemic, epidemic, pandemic, sporadic)
– Determinants: discuss etiological sources
– Specialized populations: who are the people reflected in the data? Be as specific as possible.
– Remember to compare and contrast to another area of the world
– Use scholarly, reputable resources to support your work- either CDC or WHO
Section 4: APA Usage and grammar and selected articles (10%)
– Use APA (6th ed.) formatting throughout this paper,
– At least 4 scholarly articles will be used
– APA Checklist- make sure to include the following, which will affect your grade (see APA book):
– Title page with running head
– Appropriate pagination
– Paraphrasing with in-text citation (you are limited to 2 direct quotes in the entire paper with
appropriate citation)
– Properly formatted reference (works cited) page