Ethical Theories, Leadership, and The Ethical Lens Inventory

INTRODUCTION
Leadership is often defined as the ability to influence people. An effective ethical leader guides an organization and its employees to accomplish organizational goals. In the same vein, an unethical leader can guide an organization and its employees to act unethically, harming both the organization and the stakeholders. Being a leader is an exploration, a reflection, and a test of your leadership values. Seeking understanding of how you resolve ethical dilemmas, taking inventory of where an ethical weakness may lie, and examining the traits of an ethical leader helps you define, shape, and apply an ethical decision-making framework, while also taking into consideration all stakeholders who may be impacted by your decisions.
For this task, you will respond to an ethical situation as well as analyze the results of the Ethical Lens Inventory (ELI), including your top five values from the Clarifying Your Values exercise, both of which should be completed in the course of study. This task focuses on you as a leader by helping you to define, refine, and test your ethical boundaries through self-reflection and analysis.
SCENARIO
You are a sales representative for a medical device company that manufactures artificial joints. Your company has developed an artificial knee joint that is less expensive than the competition and will dramatically reduce healing time for patients. However, it is also known to produce a serious and potentially lethal infection in a small percentage of patients. The company refuses to disclose this potential side effect. You feel you have a duty to divulge this issue, but you signed a nondisclosure agreement when you were hired and worry about possible repercussions.
REQUIREMENTS
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The originality report that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
Write an essay (suggested length of 6–8 pages) in which you do the following:

  1.  Select a nonfictional leader who you feel has exhibited exemplary ethical conduct and do the following:
  2.  Discuss twoethical traits your chosen leader has demonstrated.
  3.  Explain how your chosen leader has exhibited ethical conduct.

Note: The chosen leader can be someone you know personally or someone famous.

  1.  Compare the deontological and consequentialist perspectives and how each perspective would approach the dilemma from the scenario.
  2.  Explain which level of cognitive moral development (i.e., preconventional, conventional, or postconventional) is represented in the scenario for eachof the following questions:
  •  Which action would most likely serve the greater good in society?
  •  If I reveal this information, will I get into trouble and possibly even lose my job?
  •  Which action best aligns with my long-held belief in the principle of justice?
  •  What do the laws say, and what would a law-abiding citizen do?
  •  If I keep quiet will I get some sort of reward?

 

  1.  Reflect on your Ethical Lens Inventory (ELI) by doing the following:
  2.  Explain your preferred ethical lens, or what it means to have a center perspective relevant to the ELI.
  3.  Analyze whether you have the same preferred lens in different settings (e.g., work, personal, social).
  4.  Explain bothyour primary values and classical virtue(s) from the ELI.
  5.  Compare twoprimary values and oneclassical virtue from part D2 individually with three of the top five values from the Clarifying Your Values exercise.
  6.  Describe oneof the following from the ELI: your blind spot, risk, double standard, or vice.
  7.  Discuss threesteps you can take to mitigate the blind spot, risk, double standard, or vice described in part D3 in order to make better ethical decisions in the future.
  8.  Discuss how you plan to use the ethical lens(es) to approach ethical situations throughout your professional life.

 

  1.  Submit a copy of the PDF file with your results from the ELI, as a separate document.
  2.  Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
  3.  Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

File Restrictions
File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
File size limit: 200 MB
File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z
RUBRIC
A1:ETHICAL TRAITS

NOT EVIDENTA discussion of the ethical traits the chosen leader has demonstrated is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe discussion of 1 or more of the 2 ethical traits the chosen leader has demonstrated is illogical or poorly supported. COMPETENTThe discussion of 2 ethical traits the chosen leader has demonstrated is logical and well supported.

A2:ETHICAL CONDUCT

NOT EVIDENTAn explanation of how the chosen leader has exhibited ethical conduct is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe explanation of how the chosen leader has exhibited ethical conduct is illogical, or the ideas presented are poorly supported. COMPETENTThe explanation of how the chosen leader has exhibited ethical conduct is logical, and the ideas presented are well supported.

B:DILEMMA ANALYSIS

NOT EVIDENTThe submission does not compare the consequentialist and deontological perspectives. APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe submission does not compare how the dilemma found in the scenario would be approached from both the deontological and consequentialist perspectives. Or the comparison is illogical or poorly supported. COMPETENTThe submission compares how the dilemma found in the scenario would be approached from both the deontological and consequentialist perspectives. The submission is logical and well supported.

C:LEVELS OF COGNITIVE MORAL DEVELOPMENT

NOT EVIDENTAn explanation of which level of cognitive moral development is represented in the scenario is not provided for any of the given questions. APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe explanation of which level of cognitive moral development is represented in the scenario is poorly reasoned or illogical for 1 or more of the 5 given questions. COMPETENTThe explanation of which level of cognitive moral development is represented in the scenario is well reasoned and logical for each of the 5 given questions.

D1:PREFERRED ETHICAL LENS

NOT EVIDENTAn explanation of the preferred ethical lens or center perspective is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe explanation of the preferred ethical lens or what it means to have a center perspective is illogical or irrelevant to the ELI results. COMPETENTThe explanation of the preferred ethical lens or what it means to have a center perspective is logical and relevant to the ELI results.

D1A:DIFFERENT SETTINGS

NOT EVIDENTAn analysis of whether the candidate has the same preferred lens in different settings is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe analysis of whether the candidate has the same preferred lens in different settings is poorly supported, or the ideas presented are illogical. COMPETENTThe analysis of whether the candidate has the same preferred lens in different settings is well supported, and the ideas presented are logical.

D2:PRIMARY VALUES AND CLASSICAL VIRTUE(S)

NOT EVIDENTAn explanation of the primary values or classical virtue(s) from the ELI is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe explanation of the primary values or classical virtue(s) from the ELI is illogical or irrelevant to the ELI results. COMPETENTThe explanation of both the primary values and classical virtue(s) from the ELI is logical and relevant to the candidate’s ELI results.

D2A:COMPARISON TO TOP FIVE VALUES

NOT EVIDENTA comparison of 2 primary values and 1 classical virtue from part D2 with 3 of the top five values from the Clarifying Your Values exercise is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe comparison of the 2 primary values and 1 classical virtue is not completed individually with 1 or more of 3 of the top five values from the Clarifying Your Values exercise. Or 1 or more of the comparisons is illogical or poorly supported. COMPETENTThe comparison of the 2 primary values and 1 classical virtue is completed individually with each of the 3 of the top five values from the Clarifying Your Values exercise. Each comparison is logical and well supported.

D3:BLIND SPOT, RISK, DOUBLE STANDARD OR VICE

NOT EVIDENTA description of the blind spot, risk, double standard, or vice from the ELI is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe description of the chosen blind spot, risk, double standard, or vice from the ELI is illogical or irrelevant. COMPETENTThe description of the chosen blind spot, risk, double standard, or vice from the ELI is logical and relevant.

D3A:MAKING BETTER ETHICAL DECISIONS

NOT EVIDENTA discussion of any steps that can be taken to mitigate the chosen blind spot, risk, double standard, or vice in order to make better ethical decisions in the future is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe discussion of 1 or more of the 3 steps that could mitigate the blind spot, risk, double standard, or vice from part D3 in order to make better ethical decisions in the future is illogical or poorly supported. COMPETENTThe discussion of each of the 3 steps that could mitigate the blind spot, risk, double standard, or vice from part D3 in order to make better ethical decisions in the future is logical and well supported.

D4:USE OF ETHICAL LENSES

NOT EVIDENTA discussion of how to use the ethical lens(es) to approach ethical situations throughout the candidate’s professional life is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe discussion of how to use the ethical lens(es) to approach ethical situations throughout the candidate’s professional life is illogical, or the ideas presented are poorly supported. COMPETENTThe discussion of how to use the ethical lens(es) to approach ethical situations throughout the candidate’s professional life is logical, and the ideas presented are well supported.

E:ELI RESULTS

NOT EVIDENTA copy of the PDF file with the results from the ELI is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCENot applicable. COMPETENTA copy of the PDF file with the results from the ELI is provided.

F:SOURCES

NOT EVIDENTThe submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized, and a reference list; however, the citations and/or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate. COMPETENTThe submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available.

G:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION

NOT EVIDENTContent is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic. APPROACHING COMPETENCEContent is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective. COMPETENTContent reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.

 

Enron Scandal and Leadership

Enron Scandal and Leadership
Write a minimum of 5 full pages but no more than 4 full pages essay on Enron and how well the
firm’s leadership (Lay, Fastow, Skilling, Pai) managed their stakeholder responsibilities,
according to “The Clarkson Principles” presented in your text. Format your paper in APA style,
including a title page, in-text citations, and a References page. If you have formatting questions,
there is an APA link in our classroom resources or you can use other resources such as The Owl
at Purdue University. The movie name is The Smartest Guys In the Room.

Leadership Podcast Paper

Leadership Podcast Paper
Listen to “Nursing Homes Find Aides Key to Good Care”
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1150194?storyId=1150194
Referencing the podcast respond to the following questions
– Why is it important for a leader to empower her/his followers (employees) to own and
demonstrate any and/or all of the leadership behaviors we have learned about?
– Please note specific behaviors and types of leadership approaches your followers should
practice and why.
– Support your ideas with detailed examples or evidence.

Nursing Leadership and Management

The goal of this paper is to apply the concepts emphasized in this week’s class activities to a
nursing organization that students work at, or are familiar with from past clinical or work
experiences. There are resources for most of the agencies on the web for further research but be
aware that students must have some familiarity with the organization to complete this paper. This
does not need to be a hospital and may include home care, public health agencies, or nursing
homes. If you are concerned about whether your choice of agency is appropriate please check
with course faculty. Be sure to integrate multiple resources.
Paper Guidelines:
APA format with a title page etc. Maximum of 4 double spaced pages in length excluding title and
reference page. Use subheadings to organize the paper.
Minimum of 5 references for full points.One of these references may be the class text. Be sure
references are scholarly.
There should be evidence in this paper that you have read and integrated the learning resources
posted for this week.
The paper must answer and focus on the following questions:
Introduce the facility. What is the mission of this agency? After reading the mission what can you
say about this organization’s values?
See if you can locate a copy of the organizational structure. Remember some facilities will have
a separate structure for the nursing department that you may be more familiar with. If you cannot
locate a copy of the structure, frame your response around what you know. What type of
organizational structure is it? (refer to pp. 302-304 in your text) Where are the decisions made?
Where is nursing on the chart and who does the Chief Nursing Officer report to? How is
communication and decision making affected by the organizational structure of the facility?
Is there a Shared Governance Model within this organization? What are the advantages of the
Shared Governance Model for nursing? Remember shared governance is not just – ‘yes we have
input into decisions’ but a formal process for shared decision making. Give specific examples.
Who do you feel the stakeholders are for this organization? Give specific examples. (See text).
Briefly touch on the culture of the organization. Give specific examples. See Display 12.3, p.307
in your text.

Leadership and Stakeholder Analysis Paper

Leadership and Stakeholder Analysis Paper, Directions
3 part: Written Assignment please follow attachment
Part 1: Leadership Analysis and SWOT Analysis of Mark Zuckerberg (3 page)
Part 2: Stakeholders Analysis of Sherwin Williams R&D facility (Brecksville, Ohio) Northeast Ohio Initiative Project (3 pages)
Part 3: Synthesis of Leader and Initiative Mark Zuckerberg as a Stakeholder of Sherwin Williams R&D facility of Brecksville, Ohio

Leadership Theories. Comparing and Contrasting Leadership Styles / Theories

Instructions
Compare and contrast two leadership styles or theories
Mini-Paper: Compare and Contrast two leadership styles or theories
This Assignment fulfills the following course objective:

  1. Integrate nursing leadership concepts and theories into the various roles of the professional registered nurse to promote safe and high quality nursing care.

In this assignment you will select two different leadership styles or theories, and write a 2-3 page paper comparing/contrasting the two. Focus on how the two are similar to each other (comparison), and then describe how they differ (contrast). When you are writing this paper, reflect on analyzing the differences, how and under what conditions would they be utilized, and what is important about them. State how these would or would not be significant to the nursing profession.
Outline:
Introduction
–          Identify the two different leadership theories or styles
–          State the rationale as to why these two theories or styles were chosen
–          What is the significance of these styles or theories, why are they important
Discussion
–          Explain the similarities and differences between the two theories or styles, give examples
–          Discuss the advantages and disadvantages
–          State the conditions/environment that both of the theories or styles would work best.
Summary
–          Summarize the findings from the discussion
–          States significance to the nursing profession.

Strong Leadership in an Organisational Setting (Airline Leaders)

Strong Leadership in an Organisational Setting (Airline Leaders)
What do you have to do?
To complete this assignment you must research and study the role played by strong leadership in an organisational setting. To do this you must provide a descriptive and informative case study that profiles the current or former CEO of a major airline.  That case should focus on their personal attributes and history, contribution to that airline and discuss whether their leadership had a positive or negative impact on that company and why.
. Please read the question well and you should be in topic.
Suggested Airline Leaders
Richard Branson, Herb Kelleher, Christopher Luxon
You should choose one of these above leader to weitir an essay about him
Formatting
When completing the assignment the following minimum formatting requirements must be followed:

  • Use a font size of 10-12
  • Be written in New Zealand English.
  • Include a correctly formatted reference list in APA style.
  • Adhere to APA referencing rules as set out in the Course
  • Contain at least 1,000 but no more than 1,200 words not including the reference list.

Leadership Behavior and Culture in Organizations

Leadership Behavior and Culture in Organizations 
Required
A 550-word discussion of the influence of leadership behavior on the culture of  an organization

Leadership and Trust in Collaborative Teams

Leadership behaviors that build trust within teams
Eight axioms key to building trust among team members (Watkins, 2015).
Leadership behaviors that undermine trust within teams
Principles of effective interprofessional team leadership
How effective team leadership supports positive team relationships

Leadership and Trust in Team Collaboration

Leadership and Trust in Team Collaboration 
Instructions 
10-12 slide power point presentation
Presentation for department managers on building leadership & trust in collaborative teams.
3 current professional references
USE SUBHEADINGS
Use note section of each slide to expand talking points and reference resources.
Please answer all parts of the following 5:

  1. Identify leadership behaviors that build trust within teams and uses relevant real- world examples as evidence
  2. Identify leadership behaviors that undermine trust within teams and uses real-world examples as evidence
  3. Analyzes the consequences of a team that does not trust its leader in terms of patient safety, organizational reputation, and job satisfaction
  4. Analyze strategies team members can use to build trust among one another
  5. Describes principals of effective interprofessional team leadership and explain how effective team leadership supports positive team relationships