How to write reserach proposal dissertation guide – ask deskmatetutors.com for help

Research Proposal Guideline
Definition of a research proposal
The goal of a research proposal is twofold: to present and justify the need to study a research
problem and to present the practical ways in which the proposed study should be conducted.
Research proposals contain extensive literature reviews. They must provide persuasive evidence
that a need exists for the proposed study. In addition to providing a rationale, a proposal
describes detailed methodology for conducting the research consistent with requirements of the
professional or academic field and a statement on anticipated outcomes and/or benefits derived
from the study’s completion.
Length
The length of the research proposal is expected to be about 7 – 10 pages in length (Including the
title page and references)
Structure
1) Title page: It’s important that the Title you create for your research should reflect the essence
of your research question. Others need to know what it’s about just by reading the Title. If you
can, include the dependent and independent variables in the title. It should be descriptive and
focused without being overly wordy.
2) Introduction:
In the real world of higher education, a research proposal is most often written by scholars
seeking grant funding for a research project or it’s the first step in getting approval to write a
doctoral dissertation. Even if this is just a course assignment, treat your introduction as the initial
pitch of an idea or a thorough examination of the significance of a research problem. After
reading the introduction, your readers should not only have an understanding of what you want
to do, but they should also be able to gain a sense of your passion for the topic and to be excited
about the study’s possible outcomes. Note that most proposals do not include an abstract
[summary] before the introduction.
Think about your introduction as a narrative written in two to four paragraphs that succinctly
answers the following three questions:
1)What is the central research problem?
2)What is the topic of study related to that research problem?
3)Why is this important research, what is its significance, and why should someone reading the
proposal care about the outcomes of the proposed study?
3) Background and Significance (Can be separate or part of introduction OR Beginning of Lit.
Review):
This is where you explain the context of your proposal and describe in detail why it’s important.
It can be melded into your introduction or you can create a separate section to help with the
organization and narrative flow of your proposal. Approach writing this section with the thought
that you can’t assume your readers will know as much about the research problem as you do.
Note that this section is not an essay going over everything you have learned about the topic;
instead, you must choose what is most relevant in explaining the aims of your research.
To that end, while there are no prescribed rules for establishing the significance of your proposed
study, you should attempt to address some or all of the following:
State the research problem and give a more detailed explanation about the purpose of the study
than what you stated in the introduction. This is particularly important if the problem is complex
or multifaceted.
Present the rationale of your proposed study and clearly indicate why it is worth doing; be sure to
answer the “So What? question [i.e., why should anyone care].
Describe the major issues or problems to be addressed by your research. This can be in the form
of questions to be addressed. Be sure to note how your proposed study builds on previous
assumptions about the research problem.
Describe the boundaries of your proposed research in order to provide a clear focus. Where
appropriate, state not only what you plan to study, but what aspects of the research problem will
be excluded from the study.
If necessary, provide definitions of key concepts or terms.
4) Literature Review:
Connected to the background and significance of your study is a section of your proposal
devoted to a more deliberate review and synthesis of prior studies related to the research problem
under investigation.
The purpose here is to place your project within the larger whole of what is currently being
explored, while demonstrating to your readers that your work is original and innovative. Think
about what questions other researchers have asked, what methods they have used, and what is
your understanding of their findings and, when stated, their recommendations.
Since a literature review is information dense, it is crucial that this section is intelligently
structured to enable a reader to grasp the key arguments underpinning your proposed study in
relation to that of other researchers. A good strategy is to break the literature into “conceptual
categories” [themes] rather than systematically or chronologically describing groups of materials
one at a time.
5) Research Design and Methods
This section must be well-written and logically organized because you are not actually doing the
research, yet, your reader must have confidence that it is worth pursuing. The reader will never
have a study outcome from which to evaluate whether your methodological choices were the
correct ones. Thus, the objective here is to convince the reader that your overall research design
and proposed methods of analysis will correctly address the problem and that the methods will
provide the means to effectively interpret the potential results. Your design and methods should
be unmistakably tied to the specific aims of your study.
Describe the overall research design by building upon and drawing examples from your review
of the literature. Consider not only methods that other researchers have used but methods of data
gathering that have not been used but perhaps could be. Be specific about the methodological
approaches you plan to undertake to obtain information, the techniques you would use to analyze
the data, and the tests of external/internal validity to which you commit yourself [i.e., the
trustworthiness by which you can generalize from your study to other people, places, events,
and/or periods of time].
When describing the methods, you will use, be sure to cover the following:
Specify the research process you will undertake and the way you will interpret the results
obtained in relation to the research problem. Don’t just describe what you intend to achieve from
applying the methods you choose, but state how you will spend your time while applying these
methods [e.g., coding text from interviews to find statements about the need to change school
curriculum; running a regression to determine if there is a relationship between campaign
advertising on social media sites and election outcomes in Europe].
Keep in mind that the methodology is not just a list of tasks; it is an argument as to why these
tasks add up to the best way to investigate the research problem. This is an important point
because the mere listing of tasks to be performed does not demonstrate that, collectively, they
effectively address the research problem. Be sure you clearly explain this.
• Anticipate and acknowledge any potential barriers and pitfalls in carrying out your research
design and explain how you plan to address them. No method is perfect so you need to describe
where you believe challenges may exist in obtaining data or accessing information.
6) Preliminary Suppositions and Implications (Results/Proposed Data Analysis):
Just because you don’t have to actually conduct the study and analyze the results, doesn’t mean
you can skip talking about the analytical process and potential implications. The purpose of this
section is to argue how and in what ways you believe your research will refine, revise, or extend
existing knowledge in the subject area under investigation. You will also propose several ways
on how you will analyze your data.
Depending on the aims and objectives of your study, describe how the anticipated results will
impact future scholarly research, theory, practice, forms of interventions, or policymaking.
7) Conclusion/Discussion
The conclusion reiterates the importance or significance of your proposal and provides a brief
summary of the entire study. This section should be only one or two paragraphs long,
emphasizing why the research problem is worth investigating, why your research study is
unique, and how it should advance existing knowledge.
8) References Page:
This page essentially lists the literature that you actually used or cited in your proposal

Hypothesis Testing

Week 7 Discussion: Hypothesis Testing
Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapter 9
Lesson
Minimum of 1 scholarly source
In your reference for this assignment, be sure to include both your text/class materials AND your outside reading(s).
Initial Post Instructions
Describe a hypothesis test study that would help your work or conclusions in some way. Describe what variable would be tested and what would be your guess of the value of that variable. Then include how the result, if the null were rejected or not, might change your conclusions or actions in some way.

Qualitative Research – Assignment Help

This assignment is the final written report of your Basic Qualitative Study (In what ways do unhealthy adults seeking help through online training perceive and understand their experiences with education and educative processes?) to answer the question: “In what ways do different perspectives perceive and understand their experiences with education and educative processes?” Use the attached template to write this report. In this assignment you will combine analysis of the data that you collected during your interview with the narrative data that was collected during the first week of class – this is where ‘different perspectives’ will come from. All previous pieces (the design plan, your data sources, signed IRB letter, interview guide, and narrative coding sheets) will contribute and should be included in the final report with all necessary changes made.
In addition to previously submitted pieces, the final report write-up (the rationale, research question(s), methods, findings, and reflection) must synthesize the analysis of: (1) narratives, (2) interview transcript, and (3) your own voice as a researcher (positionality memo). Think about how you may want to title your report and how your writing will accommodate these 3 distinct perspectives on the topic that we
have been exploring this term. Remember that qualitative writing requires you to move flexibly between different meanings and themes generated by your research and highlight commonality and disjunctions in human experiences.
First: use the ‘coding report’ (attached in files) from Assignment #5 as your
guide and go through these steps:
* Type up the transcript of the interview (must be included in Appendix). This can be done by hand, or there are many online resources for transcription.
* Apply codes that you constructed in Assignment 5 to this additional piece of data (must be included in Appendix)
* Revise your coding scheme and book, if new data does not fit existing categories/themes (must be included in Appendix)
* Re-visit your findings from Assignment #5: What additional insights about the perception of educative experiences did you gain from this additional piece of data? Do you need to tweak your coding scheme? Discuss your overall findings and your interpretations to answer your research question(s). 
Second, think about all the documents you produced this term as a whole: What is the big picture? Is there one story that emerges out of these different pieces? Does one piece of data support another or does it challenge it? Do you see a patterns in how people perceive and understand their experiences with education and educative processes? How does your voice contribute to this story? Remember that you (the researcher) is the ‘primary instrument’ in qualitative inquiry, so now is your time to demonstrate how seemingly disconnected data ‘makes sense’ to you.
* 
Finally, use the attached template to write your report. The report must contain all required appendices. Outside references beyond the course text are required. Use Hwang & Vrongisinos (2010) article (attached in files) as a model for your write-up and also as a source of additional perspective on the topic of our course. Review qualitative reporting standards in the APA Manual, sections 3.13 to 3.16 (pp. 94 – 104) and consult Table 3.2 as you develop sections of your report (attached in files). 
This paper should be written using appropriate APA style and Pan’s Checklist of Guidelines, with a focus on checklists for chapters 13-15. Length of the report should be 10-12 pages: 3,000 – 3,500 words (excluding Appendices and References).
For your reference, I am a healthy, white 34-year old female from Kentucky. I am extremely active and spend a lot of time working out and eating healthy food.
Also, I am a college professor in the Exercise Science department and own an online fitness and nutrition coaching business.
I have attached a copy of the assignment details, as well as the files needed to expand upon this assignment (Research design plan, narrative, positionality memo, interview guide and transcriipt) that will be used for this assignment. There are also examples provided of how the assignment should be completed and put into words. Also, I have attached the book chapters and recommended resources to elaborate on the course material discussed during this section.

How Do You Write a Good Research Paper

Students will complete a Course Project in this class. It is worth 25% of your final grade and is a research project. Students will prepare a written report in APA format on a topic provided or approved by the instructor. The research must deal with content from the course. You must include at least 6 concepts/principles/key terms from the textbook. Identify each with bold font. If approval is required, you must turn in your proposed topic for your instructor’s approval before you begin writing. Writing on an unapproved topic will result in a zero for this project.

Your course project is a RESEARCH project and not based on your opinion. The following link is great about how to write a research paper: How Do You Write a Good Research Paper¹. That said, a few tips: Do not use “I” in a research paper. Your paper is about your research, not you. Do not state opinions or try to “fix” something. Simply, tell the reader what the research says, and answer the question “So what?”–what conclusion should your audience draw, based on your research?

Length: 5 -7 full pages (title page, abstract (if provided), reference page, graphs, etc. do not count towards page count)

Sources: Six (6) academic/peer reviewed/primary resources.

APA Guidelines:

All papers must be in proper APA format which includes at least the following:

• A properly formatted title page that is doubled-spaced and includes your name, title of paper, and School’s name in the center of the page.
• All papers must be double-spaced, with a Times New Roman, Courier New, or Arial size 12 pt. font.
• Include section headings. Section headings should be bolded. Always include an Introduction and Conclusion section. An abstract is not required.
• Indent the first line of each paragraph 0.5” from the left margin.
• You must include a reference page. References must be properly formatted, double-spaced, with the first line of the entry left justified, and following lines of the entry a hanging indent.